Death Penalty :: essays research papers fc

1st Negative case You have heard from the affirmative side and you may disagree or agree with some of their points, but the reality is that their plan result not and give the sacknot succeed in todays society. True, on paper the plan looks real good, but it will not work. Todays present system, with the finis penalty is much better off and then without it. The negative side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the death penalty should not be abolished and that todays system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the death penalty, should continue to be used. It is true that innocent mess have been executed, but that number is miniscule compared to the amount of true criminals that are rightfully executed. There is 28-step procedure necessary before any person jakes be given a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving many different people, human error is greatly reduced. The death penalty is not racially or gender b ias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The fact is that men commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women. The ratio of men to women on death row and executed is 681 or 340050 (NAACP Spring 1996). From 1976-1994, men committed 7 times as many murders as women or a 71 ratio (Sourcebook 94). Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a 701 ratio, more likely to be on death row then are women. handle gender bias, racial bias is nonexistent in the rulings involving the death penalty. Whites represent 56% of those executed, and blacks 38% (NAACP Summer of 1996). The other 6% are other minorities. The death penalty is not bias to any black market, but by just looking at the numbers game it may seem that it is. The total populations of each race will give the illusion of bias, but that is not true. The affirmative side also argues that the cost of life in prison without parole is much cheaper then the cost of the death p enalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue. The death penalty is millions cheaper then life without parole in the long run, but when our numbers are compared to the affirmatives numbers no right or wrong conclusion can be reached. No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias.